AI-Policy

Apple and Google: San Francisco Demands Removal of 13 AI Apps

2 min read
A smartphone displaying an app store grid in front of the golden dome of San Francisco City Hall, with one app tile marked by a red stop symbol Image generated with GPT Image 2
A smartphone displaying an app store grid in front of the golden dome of San Francisco City Hall, with one app tile marked by a red stop symbol

TL;DR Too Long; Didn’t read

The city attorney of San Francisco is urging Apple and Google to remove 13 apps for fake nude images from their stores within 28 days. The legal basis is a California law against intermediaries of deepfake pornography. If the companies do not comply, a legal dispute is threatened, according to the city attorney's office.

Key takeaways

  • San Francisco demands 13 AI apps from Apple and Google – eight in the App Store, five on Google Play.
  • City attorney David Chiu gave both companies a 28-day deadline after letters dated July 16.
  • Apple has already removed three applications and terminated the associated developer accounts.
  • Google says it has already deleted hundreds of apps with undressing features.
  • The legal basis is a 2025 California law targeting intermediaries of deepfake pornography.
  • Whether a lawsuit follows depends on the companies' response within the deadline.

The San Francisco city attorney, David Chiu, is demanding that Apple and Google remove 13 so-called undressing apps – programs that generate deceptively realistic nude images from uploaded photos. Eight of them were available in the App Store, five on Google Play. Following demand letters sent on July 16, both companies have 28 days to respond.

California Law Allows Lawsuits Against Intermediaries

The basis is two California laws: one makes it a crime to knowingly enable or recklessly assist the creation of non-consensual deepfake pornography. A second law, in effect since 2025, additionally allows affected individuals to file civil lawsuits against intermediaries such as app stores if they knowingly facilitate the distribution of such content. Apple and Google have earned millions in fees from the apps over the years, Chiu alleges, according to TechCrunch. Both companies have profited from apps that exploit women and girls through non-consensual intimate deepfakes and must act more proactively, the city attorney said. Speaking to MacRumors, Chiu called the apps’ practices “illegal, harmful, and completely unacceptable.” He is also demanding that the companies cut off payment processing and developer accounts for the providers involved. The Tech Transparency Project had already warned about the apps in January and April 2026. The demand letters themselves deliberately do not name the apps in question, to avoid drawing further attention to them.

Apple confirmed to 9to5Mac that it generally prohibits apps that generate, distribute, or make pornography accessible. The company said it has already removed three of the named apps, terminated the associated developer accounts, and contacted four other providers over rule violations. Users can also report violations via the reportaproblem.apple.com page. Google told MacRumors it has already deleted hundreds of apps with undressing features for policy violations, including the five named in the letter. Apple had tightened its App Store guidelines on developer responsibility for pornographic content back in June 2026. Unlike earlier lawsuits, this move targets platform operators directly for the first time, rather than individual website operators. Despite existing rules and earlier warnings, the apps remained available in the stores for months before the city stepped in.

What matters now is whether Apple and Google treat the deadline as a precedent for other cities or wait for an actual lawsuit to follow. It remains unclear whether Chiu will actually go to court if there is no response once the 28 days are up.

Frequently asked questions

What exactly are nudifying apps?

These are applications that use AI to generate fake, deceptively realistic nude images from uploaded photos – usually without the knowledge or consent of the person depicted.

Which specific apps are affected?

The city administration has not named any apps, in order to avoid giving them additional attention or publicity.

What happens if Apple and Google do not respond?

After the 28-day deadline, the city attorney could pursue legal action; whether an actual lawsuit follows remains open.

Does the demand only affect users in San Francisco?

No. Since the apps are distributed through Apple's and Google's global stores, a removal would affect users worldwide.

Have there been earlier actions against deepfake pornography?

Yes, San Francisco's city attorney's office has previously taken action against operators of such websites, though not directly against app stores.


← Back to the blog