AI-Economy

Meta stops further AI layoffs after employee protest

3 min read

TL;DR Too Long; Didn’t read

Meta has canceled the second wave of layoffs planned for November 2026 after the first round of layoffs of ten percent of the workforce in May. According to a report by Reuters, at least 20 percent of the positions were originally supposed to be cut. Internal data showed that AI agents delivered only 36 percent more shipped features despite 220 percent more code changes. Employees openly protested against the plans.

Mark Zuckerberg presses a red stop button in front of a row of marching robot silhouettes wearing the Meta logo, with relieved office workers watching in the background Image generated with GPT Image 2

Key takeaways

  • Originally, Meta planned cuts of at least 20 percent of the approximately 79,000 positions, according to Reuters.
  • The first wave effective in May affected about 8,000 positions, around ten percent of the workforce.
  • Employees feared, according to internal Workplace posts, that they were training their own AI-agent replacements.
  • Technical disruptions increased by 40 percent, and internal satisfaction fell from 74 to 55 percent.
  • Zuckerberg announced there would be no further company-wide layoffs in 2026.
  • Meta confirmed the 'Project OT' program but denies that every scenario was implemented.

Meta has scrapped the second wave of layoffs planned for November 2026 after internal criticism. That’s according to reporting by the news agency Reuters, based on internal company documents. According to those documents, at least 20 percent of the roughly 79,000 positions were originally slated for elimination – in the end, only the first wave of ten percent, effective in May, went ahead.

Internal numbers show a failing agent strategy

The reversal traces back to “Project OT,” a program launched in January 2026 that CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his leadership team devised during a retreat in Hawaii. The goal was an “AI-native” company in which autonomous software agents would take over much of the work currently done by human employees. In some planning scenarios, specific teams were to shrink by as much as 60 percent – far more than the ten percent Meta actually carried out in May.

Internal metrics painted a different picture than hoped: code changes rose 220 percent year over year, but features that actually reached users increased only 36 percent. At the same time, major technical incidents rose 40 percent, and the effort needed to fix them climbed 70 percent. At an internal meeting in July, Zuckerberg acknowledged that agent technology had not progressed as expected over the prior four months.

Employees push back against surveillance and job fears

Resistance to the plans grew after Meta installed software on US employees’ computers that logs keystrokes and mouse movements to generate training data for its in-house AI agents. Many employees responded with angry posts and gallows humor on the internal network Workplace – some illustrated their fear of training their own replacements with images of elephants, a nod to the elephant in the room. Meta’s twice-yearly sentiment survey fell from 74 to 55 percent favorable over this period.

On the night of May 19, just hours before the first wave of layoffs began, Zuckerberg decided, according to the internal documents, not to proceed with the second round planned for November. The first wave, affecting roughly 8,000 positions in May, had already prompted a lawsuit in July from 26 employees who accused Meta of using an algorithm to select protected employees for layoffs.

Meta confirms the program, disputes the details

A company spokesperson confirmed to Reuters that “Project OT” existed but denied that every scenario examined had been carried out. Instead, thousands of employees were shifted to newly created, prioritized teams – an outcome the company says was never assumed to be certain. On the allegations from July’s lawsuit, Meta reiterated that performance ratings and promotion decisions are made by people, not software. Zuckerberg told remaining staff he does not expect any further company-wide layoffs for the rest of 2026.

The reversal changes nothing about Meta’s massive AI infrastructure spending: the company recently guided to a budget of up to $145 billion for 2026, well above the roughly $72 billion it spent the prior year.

Whether the admitted failure of the internal agent strategy will also affect the pending lawsuit from the 26 plaintiffs, who accuse Meta of delegating the May layoff selection to software, remains to be seen. For other tech companies also shrinking their workforce by pointing to AI efficiency, the case offers a first, publicly documented example of how quickly such plans can collide with reality once the promised productivity fails to show up.

Frequently asked questions

How many positions did Meta actually cut in May 2026?

Meta cut around 8,000 positions, about ten percent of the global workforce. The second wave planned for November with significantly higher cuts did not take place.

What did the original plan for November 2026 entail?

According to internal documents, at least 20 percent of the approximately 79,000 positions were to be cut, with some teams even discussing cuts of up to 60 percent.

How does Meta justify the reversal?

The company confirmed the 'Project OT' program but emphasized that not every scenario examined was ever assumed to be certain. Instead, thousands of employees were shifted to new, prioritized teams.

Does the reversal affect the lawsuit filed by 26 employees in July?

Not currently apparent: Meta maintains that personnel decisions are made solely by humans. Whether the new findings on the agent strategy will play a role in the ongoing proceedings remains open.

Is Meta also cutting AI investment because the agent strategy failed?

No, spending plans remain unchanged. The company recently announced an investment budget of up to $145 billion for AI infrastructure in 2026.

Sources (3)
  1. How Zuckerberg's plan to replace Meta staff with AI unravelled (Reuters)
  2. Meta Reports First Quarter 2026 Results
  3. Zuckerberg Promised AI Would Replace Engineers. His Own Town Hall Says Otherwise.

Your AI update for the work week

Once a week, the most important AI news – plus one practical tip to try right away. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

← Back to the blog